On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:25:18PM -0700, Renee Danson Sommerfeld wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 03:59:42PM -0400, Anurag S. Maskey wrote: > > Regarding destroying NCUs of the active NCP: > > > > I found that there are no adverse effects. The NCUs are destroyed from > > nwamd's representation also. If the NCU is in offline* state, then it > > is also unplumbed. I've updated the bug at > > > > http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=10503 > > The changes for this fix (changes to libnwam_ncp.c and the first > part of the changes in door_if.c) look fine. > > > Also, includes fix for bug 10510 door_if.c:484-485 contradicts debug > > message in 480-481. > > > > http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=10510 > > I'm not so sure about this. If you make this change, does that > mean that you cannot destroy NCUs in the non-active NCP? In > other words, say the Automatic NCP is active, and I'm fiddling > around with my User NCP; am I prevented from removing NCUs until > I activate the User NCP? I think that's wrong. But maybe I'm > misunderstanding the change you've made?
Ah, I think maybe I was. This is just destroying the NCU in nwamd's internal representation of the NCP, and that will be refreshed when we activate a new NCP--so there's no need to do anything to an in- active NCP. Is that it? -renee
