Nathan, 

No algorithm per say, however, when two waves that meet, at the same frequency,
they will have a net loss equivalent to the amplitude of the opposing wave --
This will yield in the weaker signal being drowned-out by the stronger signal
and the stronger signal being degraded by the strength of the weaker signal.
Moreover, as a radio signal loses power (amplitude) at a rate that is inversely
proportional to the distance squared, one can calculate signal strength at a
given distance from the source. This is a gross simplification, but essentially,
since both services are using the same frequencies they will both experience
degradation to their signal.

In an area the size of Pioneer square, there is no reason why both services
cannot coordinate the use of their frequencies. The fact that this band is
unregulated does not preclude courtesy and cooperation.

Ian


On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Nathanial Freitas wrote:

       
       So what are the quantitative facts behind this claimed "degraded service"? 
       Is there some sort of known algorithm for determining reduction in 
       bandwidth/throughput based on the signal strength of overlapping base 
       stations at a certain point? 
       
       Thanks,
         Nathan
       
       On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Christopher Mc Carthy wrote:
       
       > <lol>, The Register's picked it up :)
       > 
       > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/26747.html
       > 
       > Starbuck's sells free WiFi access
       > By Thomas C Greene in Washington
       > Posted: 20/08/2002 at 09:23 GMT
       > 
       > If they can sell burnt, ruined coffee at premium prices, why not wireless
       > Web access one could have for free? So goes the reasoning behind Starbucks'
       > decision to offer WiFi at $30.00 a month in Portland, Oregon's Pioneer
       > Square, where free access is already provided by grassroots outfit Personal
       > Telco.
       > 
       > According to this item in The Oregonian, Starbuck's is muscling in on the
       > same channel already taken by PT, with the result that users of both
       > services are enjoying degraded performance -- only those going through
       > Starbuck's are enjoying it at a premium price.
       > 
       > The company is using T-Mobile, a VoiceStream outfit, as their provider.
       > Those who desire access outside the downtown 'WiFi free zone' are welcome to
       > shell out $50.00 a month for coverage in airports and other Starbuck's
       > stores.
       > 
       > As the turf war warms up, we have to wonder if PT can give away what a slick
       > marketing illusionist like Starbuck's can sell.
       > 
       > If they can make billions hustling the worst coffee I've ever tasted outside
       > institutional settings, well, no doubt this initiative will go quite nicely.
       > �
       > 
       > -----Message d'origine-----
       > De : Christopher Mc Carthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
       > Envoy� : 20 August 2002 11:42
       > � : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
       > Objet : "Starbucks Clashes With WiFi Hobbyists Over Airwaves"
       > 
       > 
       > 'Lifted' off slashdot - <http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/02/08/20/0431202.shtml?
       > tid=98> , of potential major interest...
       > 
       > A little quote from the article <<"If we take the stance that we're the
       > little guy and start hopping around, what happens when there are no channels
       > left?" Shand said.>>  Hear hear, way to go :))
       > 
       > Your Rights Online: Starbucks Clashes With WiFi Hobbyists Over Airwaves
       > Posted by timothy on Tuesday August 20, @03:29AM
       > from the dr-evil-at-play dept.
       > fobbman writes: "Portland Oregon's Pioneer Square (the heart of downtown)
       > has had free WiFi access provided since February by Personal Telco, which
       > is a local group of computer hobbyists. Now Starbuck's is planning on
       > offering the same service on the same band in the same area for $29.95 a
       > month, according to this story in the local fishwrap
       > <http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/xml/story.ssf/html_sta
       > ndard.xsl?/base/front_page/102975810817580.xml>. Without regulation or
       > licensing, and with WiFi growing, this could become a common problem."
       > 
       > 
       > --
       > NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
       > Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
       > Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
       > 
       
       --
       NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
       Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
       Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
       

--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/

Reply via email to