> Examples: > 1. The D-Link 900+ AP is supposed to be a great wireless repeater. I > got one cheap. I have never gotten it to recognize anything but > another D-Link. I've been told it should. An hour of tweaking for > each attempt...
its just pretty deceiving (to consumers) if it is something in the hardware which allows this ... if it is the case why even have an "alliance" to begin with ... (http://www.wifialliance.org/membersonly/images/labels/W000646.jpg) shouldnt that say interoperatable with DLink products only? i cant rant about it too much since I dont get to play around w/ APs that much, but from a "standards" viewpoint its a bad thing to have segmented labels for things - just to end up having frustrated people take stuff home w/ no hopes of things working right when they should. Oops ... I forgot thats what technology is all about :-) thanks for the review. - jon -- NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/ Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/ Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
