I don't think Google ever had valid html in the first place (I don't even think they ever tried), even before they served millions of requests. But that aside, I think the point is that a project may have their own excuses of not having a 100% valid html code.
Besides, Google isn't stupid, obviously their invalid code works in probably almost all browsers in the most efficient way. If anything, W3C should learn and adopt Google's code rather than the other way around! On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Boyd <[email protected]> wrote: > Google explains why it's site doesn't validate. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPBACTS-tyg > > I don't think any one here can use the excuse of serving millions of > pages a day. > > On Mar 20, 7:44 pm, Adi <[email protected]> wrote: >> Here's googles >> >> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&charset... >> >> who cares if they make billions, they have 40 errors...such loosers..:-/... > > -- > NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug > To post, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe, send email to > [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > nzphpug+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words > "REMOVE ME" as the subject. > -- Blue Horn Ltd - System Development http://bluehorn.co.nz -- NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nzphpug+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
