> the difference isn't enough to make development inefficient. Really? I find Firebug miles away better, but then it depends on what kind of websites you're testing.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Paul Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Adobe Browserlab works well for me for getting CSS right. Fortunately I also > have access to a PC which runs IE6, 7 and 8 for working out JS bugs. > > Lately I've found it easier / better to develop for webkit browsers first > (Chrome / Safari), then fix for Firefox, IE and Opera. The webkit inspector > isn't as good as Firebug, but the difference isn't enough to make development > inefficient. > > Paul > > -- > NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug > To post, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe, send email to > [email protected] -- Blue Horn Ltd - System Development http://bluehorn.co.nz -- NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
