[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13270024#comment-13270024
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-89:
----------------------------------
bq. Do we have a particular case where the first two alternatives are not
appropriate?
Not yet. But I fear we will as soon as the throws declarations will start to
proliferate through the code. But let's try this. At least the first two
alternatives give us a strong argument for keeping checked exceptions at a
minimum.
> Improve exception handling
> --------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-89
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-89
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core, jcr
> Affects Versions: 0.2.1
> Reporter: Michael Dürig
>
> As discusses on the @oak-dev list [1] we need to improve the way exceptions
> are thrown and handled.
> I suggest to create a OakException which extends from RuntimeException and
> encapsulate a RepositoryException into it. These exceptions can then be
> handled where appropriate. We can the later turn this into a more
> sophisticated mechanism where the OakException is mapped to a corresponding
> RepositoryException by an injected mapping (see Jukka's proposal in the
> discussion).
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/t5czrpkvyamn7sym
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
