oak-dev  

Messages by Thread

• Jackrabbit Oak 2.2.0 Release Plan Julian Reschke
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-segment-tar for org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk15on - Update #1383111836" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-examples/webapp for org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina - Update #1383107921" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-segment-tar for org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk15on - Update #1383107929" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12225 : bump aws sdk to 2.34.9 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12225 : bump aws sdk to 2.34.9 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12225 : bump aws sdk to 2.34.9 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12226: oak-jackrabbit-api should (still) target Java 11 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12226: oak-jackrabbit-api should (still) target Java 11 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12226: oak-jackrabbit-api should (still) target Java 11 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12226: oak-jackrabbit-api should (still) target Java 11 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] OAK-10335 TypeEditor misapplies default primary type of child node to its parent when the child primary type is not set [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-examples/webapp for org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina - Update #1378184924" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-segment-tar for org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk15on - Update #1378184928" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12223): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12223): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-2.0.0-plus-fixes): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12223 : bump netty to 4.1.133.Final [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12223 : bump netty to 4.1.133.Final [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12223 : bump netty to 4.1.133.Final [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12223 : bump netty to 4.1.133.Final [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12223 : bump netty to 4.1.133.Final [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • [PR] OAK-12223 : bump netty to 4.1.133.Final [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12223 : bump netty to 4.1.133.Final [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12223 : bump netty to 4.1.133.Final [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12221): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12221): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] Oak 2.0.0 plus fixes [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Oak 2.0.0 plus fixes [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Oak 2.0.0 plus fixes [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12221 Cost estimation should be lower if more conditions are indexed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] OAK-10339: Migrate to SLF4J 2.x [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12190): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12215): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-examples/webapp for org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina - Update #1374298742" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12190 Add createUserWithAbsolutePath and createGroupWithAbsolutePath to UserManager API (#2910) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12190 Add createUserWithAbsolutePath and createGroupWithAbsolutePath to UserManager API (#2910) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12190 Add createUserWithAbsolutePath and createGroupWithAbsolutePath to UserManager API (#2910) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12190 Add createUserWithAbsolutePath and createGroupWithAbsolutePath to UserManager API (#2910) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12215 Add failover mode configuration in oak-segment-azure [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12215 Add failover mode configuration in oak-segment-azure [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12215 Add failover mode configuration in oak-segment-azure [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12214): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/dependabot/maven/oak-examples/webapp/org.apache.tomcat-tomcat-catalina-9.0.118): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-examples/webapp for org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina - Update #1372937542" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-examples/webapp for org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina - Update #1372831819" failed! GitBox
• [PR] Bump org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina from 9.0.117 to 9.0.118 in /oak-examples/webapp [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina from 9.0.117 to 9.0.118 in /oak-examples/webapp [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina from 9.0.117 to 9.0.118 in /oak-examples/webapp [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12220): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12220 fix flaky test ElasticFacetTest.statisticalFacets [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12220 fix flaky test ElasticFacetTest.statisticalFacets [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12216): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12217): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12218): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12217 : reset virtual clock in test teardown [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12217 : reset virtual clock in test teardown [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12217 : reset virtual clock in test teardown [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12218 : reset virtual clock in test teardown [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12218 : reset virtual clock in test teardown [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12218 : reset virtual clock in test teardown [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12218 : reset virtual clock in test teardown [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12216): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12216): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12216): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12216 : clear segment cache after successful compaction [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12216 : clear segment cache after successful compaction [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12216 : clear segment cache after successful compaction [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12216 : clear segment cache after successful compaction [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12216 : clear segment cache after successful compaction [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12216 : clear segment cache after successful compaction [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12216 : clear segment cache after successful compaction [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12216 : clear segment cache after successful compaction [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12216 : clear segment cache after successful compaction [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12216 : clear segment cache after successful compaction [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12214): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12214): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12214): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12214): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12214): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12214): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12214): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12214): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12214): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12214): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12214 : segment cache notify L2 on L1 hits to keep frequency/recency accurate [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12214 : segment cache notify L2 on L1 hits to keep frequency/recency accurate [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12214 : segment cache notify L2 on L1 hits to keep frequency/recency accurate [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12214 : segment cache notify L2 on L1 hits to keep frequency/recency accurate [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12214 : segment cache notify L2 on L1 hits to keep frequency/recency accurate [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12214 : segment cache notify L2 on L1 hits to keep frequency/recency accurate [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12214 : segment cache notify L2 on L1 hits to keep frequency/recency accurate [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12214 : segment cache notify L2 on L1 hits to keep frequency/recency accurate [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12214 : segment cache notify L2 on L1 hits to keep frequency/recency accurate [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12214 : segment cache notify L2 on L1 hits to keep frequency/recency accurate [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12213): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12213): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12213): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12213): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12213 Tree store: child node list maybe be incorrect if an intermediate node is missing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12213 Tree store: child node list maybe be incorrect if an intermediate node is missing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12213 Tree store: child node list maybe be incorrect if an intermediate node is missing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12213 Tree store: child node list maybe be incorrect if an intermediate node is missing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12213 Tree store: child node list maybe be incorrect if an intermediate node is missing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12213 Tree store: child node list maybe be incorrect if an intermediate node is missing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12213 Tree store: child node list maybe be incorrect if an intermediate node is missing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12213 Tree store: child node list maybe be incorrect if an intermediate node is missing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12213 Tree store: child node list maybe be incorrect if an intermediate node is missing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] OAK-10801: Introduce functions to remove nodes that are older than a timestamp [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12212): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12212): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12212): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12212 fix accounting issues in the PersistentDiskCache [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12157-revert): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12203: Updated mina-core version (#2889) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12203: Updated mina-core version (#2889) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12203: Updated mina-core version (#2889) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12157: test revert [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12157: test revert [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12157: test revert [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12210): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12210): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12210): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12210): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12210): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12210): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12210): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12210): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12210): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12210): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark doe segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark doe segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark doe segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark doe segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark doe segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark doe segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark doe segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark doe segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark doe segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark doe segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark doe segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark doe segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark doe segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark doe segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12210 : added benchmark for segment cache with cachelirs, caffein… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12209): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12209: oak-upgrade: remove unused code (LengthCachingDataStore) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12209: oak-upgrade: remove unused code (LengthCachingDataStore) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12209: oak-upgrade: remove unused code (LengthCachingDataStore) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12172): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12172): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12172): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12172): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12172): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for org.apache.derby:derby - Update #1359695783" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for org.apache.derby:derby - Update #1359636128" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11224: remove guava dependencies from oak-run-commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11224: remove guava dependencies from oak-run-commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11224: remove guava dependencies from oak-run-commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11224: remove guava dependencies from oak-run-commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11224d): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• Re: [PR] OakRun Explorer GUI improvements [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12162 : removed guava's cachestats and did the final cleanup [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12162 : removed guava's cachestats and did the final cleanup [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12162 : removed guava's cachestats and did the final cleanup [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11224: remove shaded guava dep from oak-blob/pom.xml [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub

• Earlier messages