[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13293673#comment-13293673
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-138:
------------------------------------
I don't personally believe a separate Maven project for each MicroKernel
implementation will simplify things. Instead of multiple packages, we have
multiple projects. I would argue the complexity of multiple Maven projects is
higher than the complexity of multiple packages. I don't see a big advantage
for users either.
For Jackrabbit core, we have multiple persistence managers within
jackrabbit-core, and I don't think this was actually confusing for anybody.
> Move client/server package in oak-mk to separate project
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-138
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-138
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core, it, mk, run
> Affects Versions: 0.3
> Reporter: Dominique Pfister
> Assignee: Dominique Pfister
>
> As a further cleanup step in OAK-13, I'd like to move the packages
> o.a.j.mk.client and o.a.j.mk.server and referenced classes in oak-mk to a
> separate project, e.g. oak-mk-remote.
> This new project will then be added as a dependency to:
> oak-core
> oak-run
> oak-it-mk
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
