Hi, On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Michael Dürig <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes but... with and without such a lease mechanism my approach is more > general and doesn't hurt anything: if older revisions are available my > approach generates a more fine grained set of events. If older revisions are > not available any more it just gracefully degenerated to your approach. If > in the extreme only two revisions (last observed and latest) are available > it is the same as your approach.
OK, I'm fine with that. This means basically that we don't make guarantees about things like user data, etc. Should we just drop them entirely instead of having a vague "they might be there but don't rely on it" contract? BR, Jukka Zitting
