hi jukka
On 6/27/12 11:43 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Angela Schreiber<[email protected]> wrote:
a) is it on purpose that the value constructors are public?
The value classes are package-private, which also limits the
visibility of the constructors. Having the constructors public is just
a personal stylistic preference.
exactly... that's why i was wondering whether it was your intention
to do that or not... since i found the other issue i wasn't sure
about the public constructor . after all i deliberately stated that
the latter just was my preference, didn't i?
kind regards
angela
