oak-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11888): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11888): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11888): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11888): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11888: Remove usage of Guava ThreadBuilderFactory [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11888: Remove usage of Guava ThreadBuilderFactory [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11888: Remove usage of Guava ThreadBuilderFactory [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11888: Remove usage of Guava ThreadBuilderFactory [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11887): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11886 : replaced Guavs's Futures.immediateFuture with JDK complet… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11886 : replaced Guavs's Futures.immediateFuture with JDK complet… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11886 : replaced Guavs's Futures.immediateFuture with JDK complet… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11886 : replaced Guavas's Futures.immediateFuture with JDK complet… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] WIP: Upgrade to lucene 9.7.0 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11885: Remove usage of Guava collect.ListMultiMap [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11885: Remove usage of Guava collect.ListMultiMap [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11885: Remove usage of Guava collect.ListMultiMap [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11885: Remove usage of Guava collect.ListMultiMap [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for ch.qos.logback:logback-core - Update #1085810888" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for org.apache.derby:derby - Update #1085810890" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for com.h2database:h2 - Update #1085810930" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-9212_2): Workflow run "Commit Check" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11884: AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11884: AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11884: AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11884: AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11884: AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11884: AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should delete segments only if write acces is allowed [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/revert-2467-issue/OAK-9212): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
• [PR] Revert "OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments" [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments" [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments" [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments" [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/jsedding/OAK-11861-move-forkjoin): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/jsedding/OAK-11861-move-forkjoin): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11883): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11861): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11861: move forkjoin package to internal [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861: move forkjoin package to internal [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861: move forkjoin package to internal [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11883: Remove usage of Guava collect.Range [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11883: Remove usage of Guava collect.Range [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11883: Remove usage of Guava collect.Range [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11883: Remove usage of Guava collect.Range [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11883: Remove usage of Guava collect.Range [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-9897-split-persistence-gc): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for com.h2database:h2 - Update #1084581749" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for org.apache.derby:derby - Update #1084581748" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for ch.qos.logback:logback-core - Update #1084581752" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11300): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11881): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11881): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11881: Remove usage of Guava Maps.map() [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11881: Remove usage of Guava Maps.map() [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11881: Remove usage of Guava Maps.map() [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11881: Remove usage of Guava Maps.map() [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-9897-split-persistence-gc): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-9897-split-persistence-gc): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• Re: [PR] Oak 9897 split persistence gc [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Oak 9897 split persistence gc [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Oak 9897 split persistence gc [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Oak 9897 split persistence gc [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Oak 9897 split persistence gc [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Oak 9897 split persistence gc [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Oak 9897 split persistence gc [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11864 : fixed 2 failing unit cases [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11864 : fixed 2 failing unit cases [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11864 : fixed 2 failing unit cases [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11864 : fixed 2 failing unit cases [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11875_2): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-9212): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-9212): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11875 : added unit cases for EmptyProps and split document issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11875 : added unit cases for EmptyProps and split document issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11875 : added unit cases for EmptyProps and split document issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11875 : added unit cases for EmptyProps and split document issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11875 : added unit cases for EmptyProps and split document issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • [PR] OAK-11875 : added unit cases for EmptyProps and split document issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11875 : added unit cases for EmptyProps and split document issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11875 : added unit cases for EmptyProps and split document issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11875 : added unit cases for EmptyProps and split document issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11875 : added unit cases for EmptyProps and split document issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11875 : added unit cases for EmptyProps and split document issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11875): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11875: Introduced test case for empty properties/Split documents issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11875: Introduced test case for empty properties/Split documents issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11875: Introduced test case for empty properties/Split documents issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11875: Introduced test case for empty properties/Split documents issue [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11878): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11878 ClusterNodeStoreLock LOCK_TIMEOUT is too large [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11878 ClusterNodeStoreLock LOCK_TIMEOUT is too large [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11878 ClusterNodeStoreLock LOCK_TIMEOUT is too large [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11878 ClusterNodeStoreLock LOCK_TIMEOUT is too large [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11878 ClusterNodeStoreLock LOCK_TIMEOUT is too large [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11878 ClusterNodeStoreLock LOCK_TIMEOUT is too large [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] OAK-9546 failing test for references of moved node [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-9212): Workflow run "Commit Check" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-9212): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-9212): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-9212): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11300: update package dependencies wrt primitives [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11300: update package dependencies wrt primitives [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11300: update package dependencies wrt primitives [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11300: update package dependencies wrt primitives [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-9212 AzureArchiveManage.listArchives() should not delete segments [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11300: shaded-guava: remove packages that are not used (anymore) … [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11300: shaded-guava: remove packages that are not used (anymore) … [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11300: shaded-guava: remove packages that are not used (anymore) … [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11300: shaded-guava: remove packages that are not used (anymore) … [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • [PR] OAK-11300: shaded-guava: remove packages that are not used (anymore) … [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11300: shaded-guava: remove packages that are not used (anymore) … [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11300: shaded-guava: remove packages that are not used (anymore) … [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11300: shaded-guava: remove packages that are not used (anymore) … [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11300: shaded-guava: remove packages that are not used (anymore) … [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11869): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11870): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11870): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11870): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11870): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11869): Workflow run "Commit Check" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11870: - allow passing fullGCGeneration parameter to RevisionsCommand [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11870: - allow passing fullGCGeneration parameter to RevisionsCommand [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11870: - allow passing fullGCGeneration parameter to RevisionsCommand [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11870: - allow passing fullGCGeneration parameter to RevisionsCommand [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11870: - allow passing fullGCGeneration parameter to RevisionsCommand [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11870: - allow passing fullGCGeneration parameter to RevisionsCommand [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11873 also log the caller for Fulltext searches [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11873 also log the caller for Fulltext searches [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11873 also log the caller for Fulltext searches [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize - move commons.function to commons.internal.function [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize - move commons.function to commons.internal.function [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize - move commons.function to commons.internal.function [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize - move commons.function to commons.internal.function [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11832 : moved Traverser to internal.graph package and marked as i… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11832 : moved Traverser to internal.graph package and marked as i… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11832 : moved Traverser to internal.graph package and marked as i… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11832 : moved Traverser to internal.graph package and marked as i… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11869): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11869): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11869): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11869): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11869 : removed usage of Guava's hashing with apache commons-codec [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11656): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11656): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11656): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11656): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
• [DISCUSS] Expand oak/docs/participating vs API changes Julian Reschke
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for com.h2database:h2 - Update #1079514606" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for org.apache.derby:derby - Update #1079514608" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for ch.qos.logback:logback-core - Update #1079514605" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11300): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11300): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11300: shaded-guava: remove packages that are not used (anymore) (ongoing) - math [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11300: shaded-guava: remove packages that are not used (anymore) (ongoing) - math [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11300: shaded-guava: remove packages that are not used (anymore) (ongoing) - math [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11300: shaded-guava: remove packages that are not used (anymore) (ongoing) - math [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages