[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406999#comment-13406999
]
Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-167:
-----------------------------------
bq. wouldn't that ideally be the transient space, i.e. oak-jcr?
We in any case need some way to represent uncommitted content in oak-core, as
otherwise there's no way to do things like node type or access control
validation before a commit. Instead of coming up with another data structure
for that, it's better to use the one we already have in the NodeStore/NodeState
abstraction. Ideally a caching layer wouldn't even be needed for this, but that
would require more support from the MicroKernel.
> Caching NodeStore implementation
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-167
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-167
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: core
> Reporter: Jukka Zitting
>
> For remote MicroKernel implementations and other cases where local caching of
> content is needed it would be useful to have a NodeStore implementation that
> maintains a simple in-memory or on-disk cache of frequently accessed content.
> Such a NodeStore implementation could also be used to better isolate the
> current caching logic behind uncommitted changes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira