Hi, On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Angela Schreiber <[email protected]> wrote: > oh, i see... i got that wrong since the original mail and the issue > gave me the impression that there already exists quite some internal > content.
Right. I wanted to bring this up already now as we're about to start hitting such cases. > if i understand you properly it's currently just 1 internal content > property ":childOrder" and for this case you already stated in your > previous post, that it was better to cover this with an API method. Exactly. > what's your preference regarding the corresponding issue > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-182 > > shall we resolve it? the current proposal doesn't seem to > cover the conclusion from the mailing list, right? The code in trunk is a bit out of sync with the latest thinking on this, so let's keep the issue open at least until that's resolved. BR, Jukka Zitting
