[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13423847#comment-13423847
]
Michael Marth commented on OAK-210:
-----------------------------------
Do you see this as something to be implemented (or not) by each MK
independently (i.e. something like an MK implementation detail)?
> granularity of persisted data
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-210
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-210
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: mk
> Reporter: Stefan Guggisberg
> Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
>
> the current persistence granularity is _single nodes_ (a node consists of
> properties and child node information).
> instead of storing/retrieving single nodes it would IMO make sense to store
> subtree aggregates of specific nodes. the choice of granularity could be
> based on simple filter criteria (e.g. property value).
> dynamic persistence granularity would help reducing the number of records and
> r/w operations on the underlying store, thus improving performance.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
