Hi, On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Marcel Reutegger <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess this is due to NodeState not knowing its name, but > on the other hand separating the name from the child > NodeState allows for enumerating the names only without > the need to actually load the states...
Rigth. There are also the nice design aspects of not making a special case of the root node or having to worry about ensuring consistency constraints like name.equals(node.getChildNode(name).getName()). BR, Jukka Zitting
