Hi, On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Michael Dürig <[email protected]> wrote: > Why null and not an empty array? Is there a case supporting this behaviour > or is this just the implementation leaking into the spec.?
IIRC the idea was to distinguish between the cases where there are no definitions (empty array) and where no definition information is yet available (null, the template is still being constructed). BR, Jukka Zitting
