On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:48 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> > wrote: >> ...Currently, Jackrabbit mostly considers the repository as a monolithic >> unit of content, yet typical applications have widely varying >> requirements when it comes to indexing, performance, observation, >> eventual consistency etc. for various parts of their content. Being >> able to have different settings for those various subtrees can make a >> big difference IMO. > > if we can mount workspaces into other workspaces, then maybe configuration of > this could > still be tied to a workspace and not nodes in the tree....
Agreed, using workspaces in this way might work if the mounts are transparent at the JCR level. -Bertrand
