Hi, I didn't change it because I don't understand why it is currently done that way. my first impression was also that one could use the NodeStore and NodeStates to manipulate content.
anyone know why it's currently done on the MK directly? Regards Marcel > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Dürig [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Montag, 1. Oktober 2012 18:23 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1392352 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk: oak- > core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/ oak- > core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/core/ oak- > core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/osgi/ oak- > core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackr... > > > > On 1.10.12 15:36, [email protected] wrote: > > Author: mreutegg > > Date: Mon Oct 1 14:36:57 2012 > > New Revision: 1392352 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1392352&view=rev > > Log: > > OAK-41: Initial repository setup > > > [...] > > +public class InitialContent extends DefaultMicroKernelTracker { > > + > > + @Override > > + public void available(MicroKernel mk) { > > + NodeStore nodeStore = new Oak(mk).createNodeStore(); > > + // FIXME: depends on CoreValue's name mangling > > + NodeState root = nodeStore.getRoot(); > > + if (root.hasChildNode("jcr:system")) { > > + mk.commit("/", "^\"jcr:primaryType\":\"nam:rep:root\" ", null, > null); > > + } else { > > + mk.commit("/", "^\"jcr:primaryType\":\"nam:rep:root\"" + > > + "+\"jcr:system\":{" + > > + "\"jcr:primaryType\" :\"nam:rep:system\"," + > > + "\":unique\" > :{\"jcr:uuid\":{},\"rep:authorizableId\":{},\"rep:principalName\":{}}," + > > + "\"jcr:versionStorage\" > :{\"jcr:primaryType\":\"nam:rep:versionStorage\"}," + > > + "\"jcr:nodeTypes\" > :{\"jcr:primaryType\":\"nam:rep:nodeTypes\"}," + > > + "\"jcr:activities\" > :{\"jcr:primaryType\":\"nam:rep:Activities\"}," + > > + "\"rep:privileges\" > :{\"jcr:primaryType\":\"nam:rep:Privileges\"}}", null, null); > > + } > > + > > + BuiltInNodeTypes.register(new Oak(mk).createRoot()); > > + } > > +} > > Shouldn't it be pretty easy to resolve this FIXME now? I.e. either use a > Root instance or a NodeStore and NodeBuilders for adding this initial > structure? > > Michael
