On 5.11.12 12:57, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
Hi,

I noticed that we use ReadOnlyTree in various plugins even though the class
is in the oak core package, which I think should be considered implementation
internal.

I think it makes sense to move it to an spi package. WDYT?

Generally +1. But OTOH the same also holds for RootImpl. So we might want to go for a more general solution and provide an internal API for obtaining Trees/Roots.

Michael


Regards
  Marcel

  • ReadOnlyTree Marcel Reutegger
    • Re: ReadOnlyTree Michael Dürig

Reply via email to