On 22.11.2012, at 19:15, Alexander Klimetschek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi everyone, > > I came across [0] and its interesting "Don't fear the filesystem!" section. > That brought me to the "stupid" question: > > Why does Jackrabbit/Oak not map JCR hierarchies directly to the filesystem? > > Things that come to my mind, but I am not sure if you couldn't overcome them > with some creativity: > - transactions > - names: JCR allowing almost unrestricted node names, file systems probably > not > - batch-write performance (though in-memory buffering in OS should have the > same effect) > > [0] http://incubator.apache.org/kafka/design.html sure .. or git regards, Lukas
