> Instead of the MicroKernel trying to merge changes, I would prefer if the > MicroKernel would fail if a node was changed, moved or deleted after the > base revision of a commit. That way, the MicroKernel API would still need > a base revision in the commit call (the base revision would arguably be > even more important), but the behaviour would slightly change.
isn't this exactly what Michael described previously in this thread? regards marcel
