Hi, On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Angela Schreiber <[email protected]> wrote: > as far as i remember we never decided to use the path as > identifier. we said that we want to keep it as stable as > possible... for a referenceable node Node#getIdentifier > returns the UUID for a non-referenceable node it should > include the parent identifier and a relative path thing.
I think Michael was referring just to nodes that are non-referenceable and have no referenceable ancestors. The relevant discussions are summarized in OAK-101. BR, Jukka Zitting
