On 7.2.13 13:40, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Angela Schreiber <[email protected]> wrote:
as far as i remember we never decided to use the path as
identifier. we said that we want to keep it as stable as
possible... for a referenceable node Node#getIdentifier
returns the UUID for a non-referenceable node it should
include the parent identifier and a relative path thing.
I think Michael was referring just to nodes that are non-referenceable
and have no referenceable ancestors. The relevant discussions are
summarized in OAK-101.
Yes indeed. Thanks for clarifying.
Michael
BR,
Jukka Zitting
