Hi,
AFAIK indexing currently uses commit hooks for keeping the index up to
date when content changes. As Jukka mentioned this might not be the
right thing to do since when a commit fails, we end up with invalid
index entries. The conclusion was, that indexing should use the
Observer, which is only called after a successful commit rather then a
commit hook. (See OAK-628 for why this currently wouldn't work though).
However, there is a difference depending on whether the index is stored
in content or external. For the former case using commit hooks is the
right thing to do. In the case of a failed commits nothing is written at
all, not even the index data. Using and observer here still works, but
would leave the index lagging behind for the time the commit actually
succeeded until the observer is finally called.
For externally stored indexes I think we need to live with the lag in
favour of having a consistent index.
Michael
- commit hooks and indexing Michael Dürig
-