Hi, On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > Large transactions: I think we didn't define this as a strict requirement.
It's probably not the most important thing for Oak to achieve, but we did list it as a goal in http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Goals%20and%20non%20goals%20for%20Jackrabbit%203: * Big transactions (> 100k nodes at 1kB each) > I didn't analyze the results, but could the problem be orderable child > nodes? That may well be, in the benchmark code I don't explicitly specify a non-orderable node type so it defaults to the orderable nt:unstructured. BR, Jukka Zitting
