Hi, On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Chetan Mehrotra <[email protected]> wrote: > Currently some packages are exported at 0.18, 0.16 and some are being > exported at bundle version.
We should add explicit package versions to all exported packages. > Should we bump all of them to 1.0.0 for the 1.0 release Yes. After 1.0 we'll need to be much more strict about backwards compatiblity, so bumping the major version number now is a good idea. > and ensue they are consistent from there on. Not consistent, correct. The package versions should evolve semantically based on changed to those specific packages, not in sync with the broader Oak/Jackrabbit release cycle. > Also would helpful to review the list once i.e. if the package export > is required for e.g in oak-solr-osgi exports quite abit but are > probably not required. Agreed. The fewer packages we export now in 1.0, the less backwards compatibility effort will be required down the line. BR, Jukka Zitting
