Hi, On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Thomas Mueller <muel...@adobe.com> wrote: >>My other concern on this point is that it's not granted, in my opinion, >>that the index returning less entries would be the faster. > > Yes, it's not that much about less entries or more entries, it's about > lower or higher cost. If there are more entries, but they are all in > memory, then that's better than less entries, but you need a disk read for > each entry. That's what the javadocs talk about.
There's no way for a query index to know whether a particular node is cached in memory or not. BR, Jukka Zitting
