Hi, I haven't looked at details, but it sounds reasonable. Can you create an issue and a patch for review?
Regards Marcel On 25/10/14 14:27, "Julian Reschke" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi there, > >both the MongoDocumentStore and the RDBDocumentStore maintain a >"_modCount" property, which uniquely identifies a version of a document >in the persistence. > >Sometimes, we read data from the persistence although we already might >have the document cached. This happens: > >a) when the cached document is older than what the caller asked for > >b) when running a query (for instance when looking up children of a node) > >In both cases, we currently replace the cache entry with a newly built >NodeDocument. > >Question: > >Would it make sense to re-use the existing document instead? (This would >probably require modifying the "created" timestamp, but would avoid the >trouble of having to update the cache at all) > >Best regards, Julian
