Hi Tommaso, On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote: > the drawback is that you would have to define a similar structure for each > field to be boosted for each node type, the advantage is that it's > compliant with what we have in 1.0.8.
I would also prefer that but couple of things need to be supported 1. The JR2 index format supported NodeType inheritance. So index rule defined at start would supercede defintion defined later. Hence the need of list based on NodeType 2. Support for regular expression in property names - In JR2 property name regex was scoped by nodeType. Turning it around would make it tricky Chetan Mehrotra
