Good morning Chetan, On 26/11/2014 09:46, Chetan Mehrotra wrote: > ... > The newer Lucene fulltext support would not support some cases. See > [1] and probably would not be supporting them in near future. To allow > users to try newer index and adapt the indexing configuration to get > such queries work I was thinking to keep V1 as the default for now and > later switch the default to V2 (say Oak 1.0.10?). To make use of new > features they need to set 'compatMode' to 2 in index configuration > > Q. Would it be fine to continue to use V1 (old LuceneIndex) for newer > setups as default for next release 1.0.9 > will it be possible to have oak trunk with V2 as default and 1.0 with V1? In this way customer already running the stable version won't see any difference while the ones using the unstable for experimental purposes could leverage the new algorithms and report issues before it goes in production. Will it be too painful for merging?
Cheers Davide
