Hi, OK, next time, I will vote -1 in such a situation.
Regards, Thomas On 10/03/15 11:35, "Marcel Reutegger" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >the vote passes as follows: > >+1 Michael Dürig >+1 Amit Jain >+1 Alex Parvulescu >+1 Davide Giannella >+1 Julian Reschke >+1 Thomas Mueller > >I'll push the release out. > >Thomas, your vote was a bit unclear. Your first statement was >a +1 vote. Later you voiced concerns and suggested to not >release the candidate as 1.0.12, though you didn't want to >have it interpreted as a -1. > >Maybe you didn't want to vote -1 because you thought it is a veto? >This is a majority vote and the release candidate will only fail >if we don't reach a majority of +1s or not sufficient +1s (three are >required at least). > >Regards > Marcel > >On 04/03/15 11:07, "Marcel Reutegger" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.12 release is available at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.12/ >> >>The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: >> >> >>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.1 >>2 >>/ >> >>The SHA1 checksum of the archive is >>c442265596bb303042b4d3b2e218201d850ec153. >> >>A staged Maven repository is available for review at: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/ >> >>The command for running automated checks against this release candidate >>is: >> >> $ sh check-release.sh oak 1.0.12 >>c442265596bb303042b4d3b2e218201d850ec153 >> >>Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.12. >>The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >>least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.12 >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... >> >> >> >> >>Regards >> Marcel >> >
