On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Manfred Baedke <[email protected]> wrote: > which is just as broken in IMHO and failed to write blobs in Oak2Oak > migration scenarios.
Thats why I would like to have a testcase for this. So far current designed assumed that BlobStore is singleton. Supporting blobs from multiple BlobStore would impact other places also. > I would also consider two blobs to be equal iff they contain the same binary > content, which is also not the contract we use for BlobStoreBlob. Have a look at AbstractBlob#equal on what is considered as a blob equality contract which takes care of that. So probably we use that here So if we plan to support such case then we cleanup this part first and then fix it. wdyt? Chetan Mehrotra
