Hi, I'm not in favour of this, as it breaks links, and I don't see a clear improvement. I'm more in favour of incremental, small changes.
> an easier way to add/update documentation about oak specific features. Sorry I don't understand, what is the problem with the current approach? Is the menu too large? Sure, we could add some structure, but I wouldn't just add "features". > >Currently we have a section in the left-hand menu: Features and plugins. I think "plugins" is an arbitrary name, it might as well just be "features". >This mean that if we add a feature over there we have to update the >whole doc site as the menu is eventually static in all pages. I'm sorry I don't understand. The left-hand menu is in site.xml (in one place). I don't think we will add all that many "features" to Oak in the future. Regards, Thomas
