probably not related to the repackaging. I have a candidate here [0], it looks like this file is not closed, which may account for Win complaining. let me see if I can fix it.
[0] https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-segment/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/segment/file/FileStoreIT.java#L188 On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Julian Reschke < [email protected]> wrote: > On 2016-01-22 14:57, Francesco Mari wrote: > >> 2016-01-22 14:22 GMT+01:00 Julian Reschke <[email protected]>: >> >> On 2016-01-21 19:30, Francesco Mari wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I committed a big change in r1726048 because of OAK-3744. I had to move >>>> some code around and adjust some POMs and tests. Please let me know if >>>> something is broken for you. I did my best by running unit and >>>> integration >>>> tests on my machine before committing, but I can't guarantee a 100% >>>> success >>>> rate on every development machine out there. >>>> >>>> If something is broken, please reply to this email or create a new issue >>>> and assign it to me. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Francesco >>>> >>>> >>> Hi there, >>> >>> I see two problems. >>> >>> 1) integration tests failing: >>> >>> testRecovery(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.segment.file.FileStoreIT) >>> >>>> Time elapsed: 0.554 sec <<< ERROR! >>>> java.io.IOException: Could not remove broken tar file >>>> target\FileStoreIT1303808629179878423dir\data00000a.tar >>>> at >>>> >>>> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.segment.file.TarReader.backupSafely(TarReader.java:237) >>>> at >>>> >>>> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.segment.file.TarReader.collectFileEntries(TarReader.java:196) >>>> at >>>> >>>> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.segment.file.TarReader.open(TarReader.java:125) >>>> at >>>> >>>> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.segment.file.FileStore.<init>(FileStore.java:434) >>>> >>>> >>> (yes, on Windows) >>> >>> >> Is it failing consistently? >> > > Yup, consistently. Manfred is seeing the same on Windows. > > As code and test probably did not change since yesterday -- did the > re-packaging change anything about test execution? > > Best regards, Julian >
