Hi,
I had run the same test changing only the DocumentNodeStore type as in the
following code:
final DocumentMK.Builder builder = new DocumentMK.Builder();
builder.setBlobStore(createFileSystemBlobStore());
final DocumentNodeStore ns = getMongoDocumentNodeStore(builder);
private DB db = new MongoClient("127.0.0.1", 27017).getDB("test2");
private DocumentNodeStore getMongoDocumentNodeStore(DocumentMK.Builder builder)
{
DocumentNodeStore ns = null;
if (builder == null) {
ns = new DocumentMK.Builder().
setMongoDB(db).getNodeStore();
} else {
ns = builder.
setMongoDB(db).getNodeStore();
}
return ns;
}
With mongo i had run the test without errors.
Best regards
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Julian Reschke [mailto:[email protected]]
Inviato: giovedì 25 febbraio 2016 11:44
A: [email protected]
Cc: Diquigiovanni Simone <[email protected]>
Oggetto: Re: R: info about oak and RDMBS
On 2016-02-25 11:30, Ancona Francesco wrote:
> Yes.
>
> We tried the following combination:
> 1) metadata on mongo and binary mongo
> 2) metadata on mongo and binary using filesystem
>
> Best regards
It looks like the repository construction doesn't work (nodetype index missing).
Can you double-check that your code for Mongo really has the same steps?
Best regards, Julian
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp
Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
