Hi Vikas, thanks for the reply.
> On 16 Aug 2016, at 14:38, Vikas Saurabh <[email protected]> wrote: > * It'd incur a very heavy migration impact on upgrade or RDB setups - > that, most probably, would translate to us having to support both > schemas. I don't feel that it'd easy to flip the switch for existing > setups. That’s true. I think we should take a similar approach here as with the segment / segment-tar implementations (and we can use oak-upgrade to convert between them). At least for now. > * DocumentNodeStore implementation very freely touches prop:rev=value > for a given id… […] I think this would get > expensive for index (_id+propName+rev) maintenance. Indeed, probably we’ll have to analyse the indexing capabilities offered by different database engines more closely, choosing the one that offers good writing speed. Best regards, Tomek -- Tomek Rękawek | Adobe Research | www.adobe.com [email protected]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
