On 2016-10-21 16:15, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
You are sure using many emotional, judgmental words and sentences like
"joke", "embarrassing", "nonsense", "We shouldn't go backward, but
forward", "pet project", "admit", "level of complexity", "doesn't allow",
"dumping grounds". Your whole mail is very judgmental.
OK, I see you would like to split everything into tiny, tiny modules.
Right now we already have many modules, and using a different release
cycle for oak-segment-tar is not a problem.
So your solution is to split things into even more modules. I see that, as
you seem to be very emotional about that.
But I don't agree that's the best solution. I prefer simple solutions,
that don't require a lot of bureaucracy and overhead.
I see no big value in "being able" to release things independently. In
fact I think it's added overhead, with no value.
Regards,
Thomas
Big +1.
Best regards, Julian
