I agree in general. And we could as well also keep our current Jenkins
instance. It is just that it doesn't provide much value unless we spent
a lot of time on it, which didn't happen in the (extended) past.
Michael
On 17.11.16 2:15 , Tommaso Teofili wrote:
sorry but I disagree, while Adobe can have its internal infrastructure run
whatever kind of tests, I think Oak should have its own continuous build
working on the ASF infra, if anything needs to be adjusted we can get in
touch with infra@.
Other than that I am sorry I could not spend more time on CI setup (and Oak
in general) lately.
Regards,
Tommaso
Il giorno gio 17 nov 2016 alle ore 13:35 Michael Dürig <[email protected]>
ha scritto:
On 17.11.16 12:31 , Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Michael Dürig <[email protected]>
wrote:
...I was mostly thinking of using some internal resources as so far the
public
options didn't work out for us...
Internal to what?
To Adobe
Michael
-Bertrand
