> (patch which updates an existing test to show this at [0]. That patch
> would make ObservationQueueFullWarnTest#warnOnQueueFull fail.)
>
Attaching patch as inline one seemingly got malformed.
Thanks,
Vikas
diff --git
a/oak-jcr/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/jcr/observation/ObservationQueueFullWarnTest.java
b/oak-jcr/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/jcr/observation/ObservationQueueFullWarnTest.java
index dda8eab..3fddac5 100644
---
a/oak-jcr/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/jcr/observation/ObservationQueueFullWarnTest.java
+++
b/oak-jcr/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/jcr/observation/ObservationQueueFullWarnTest.java
@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ public class ObservationQueueFullWarnTest extends
AbstractRepositoryTest {
try {
customLogs.starting();
addNodeToFillObsQueue();
+ emptyObsQueue();
assertTrue("Observation queue full warning must get logged",
customLogs.getLogs().size() > 0);
customLogs.finished();
} finally {
@@ -196,7 +197,7 @@ public class ObservationQueueFullWarnTest extends
AbstractRepositoryTest {
throws RepositoryException {
blockObservation.acquireUninterruptibly();
try {
- for (int i = 0; i <= OBS_QUEUE_LENGTH; i++) {
+ for (int i = 0; i <= OBS_QUEUE_LENGTH+1; i++) {
addANode("n");
}
} finally {
@@ -222,6 +223,7 @@ public class ObservationQueueFullWarnTest extends
AbstractRepositoryTest {
//up in case last few event were dropped due to full observation
queue
//(which is ok as the next event that comes in gets diff-ed with
last
//processed revision)
+ /*
if (numAddedNodes.get() < numObservedNodes.get() +
OBS_QUEUE_LENGTH) {
try {
addANode("addedWhileWaiting");
@@ -229,6 +231,7 @@ public class ObservationQueueFullWarnTest extends
AbstractRepositoryTest {
LOG.warn("exception while adding during wait: {}", e);
}
}
+ */
Thread.sleep(OBS_TIMEOUT_PER_ITEM/10);//The constant is exaggerated
remaining = end - System.currentTimeMillis();
}