On 31.03.17 07:06, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Thomas Mueller <[email protected]> wrote:
Depending on that, we can use "Maven" module boundaries, or "Logical" module
boundaries.
My preference is for "Logical" module boundaries and not be bounded by
the Maven module boundaries.
I would prefer to stay aligned with Maven boundaries as much as possible
as this simplifies bug reporting for parties not deeply involved with
Oak very much. Most of the apparent need to break out of that scheme is
to me rather a symptom of missing modularity rather than a cure. If we
introduce logical modules in Jira, I strongly suggest to come up with a
clear and concise definition for them: what exactly belongs to them,
what not? What are the criteria and how are they applied. Can modules
overlap? Do they need to stay aligned with the boundaries of the Maven
modules or can a logical module be part of multiple Maven modules?
Michael
