Yes, but now we'd break all existing implementations.
On 4/4/2017 11:09 AM, Davide Giannella wrote:
On 03/04/2017 15:49, Michael Dürig wrote:
Confirmed, this is principle name. At least this is what it was built
for in Jackrabbit 2. The string passed is escaped vis
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.commons.QueryUtils#escapeForQuery
Just for the sake of discussion. Wouldn't it be better to just pass in
the Principal itself and let the QueryBuilder implementation to deal
with all the requirements of the actual QueryBuilder itself? Escaping
and what ever other things it may be fancying of?
D.