Hi Robert plugins.tree would feel natural to me. regarding the export: not sure about that either... the plugins.tree has some unfortunate dependencies e.g. to oak.core. so probably more work ahead in that area.
kind regards angela On 06/04/17 16:41, "Robert Munteanu" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >Working in the m12n branch [1] I'm trying to get rid of the >o.a.j.oak.util package and the last surviving members are >ApproximateCounter, NodeUtil and TreeUtil. > >As I see it these classes are essentially helpers built on top of the >Tree and NodeState APIs. Those would make them candidates on for either >oak-store-spi or (if we manage to trim down the dependencies) oak-base. > >However I am having trouble naming the package which will hold them. >They're not part of the spi, so I can't put them in spi.state . > >Maybe they belong in oak-core in plugins.tree, but I'm not sure if we >want to keep that as a package which is exported outside oak-core. > >Thoughts? > >Robert > >[1]: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co >m%2Fmreutegg%2Fjackrabbit-oak%2Ftree%2Fm12n&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbfc1feb5ff4a >4866c79c08d47cfafe6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63627086 >4841267177&sdata=CWwq4ifTZIU1gW9UEd2STRLm%2B1svSP0kvlkLMksmWcM%3D&reserved >=0
