On 2017-05-11 14:03, Angela Schreiber wrote:
hi julian
no i didn't, because i don't think it makes sense to enforce a running
mongoDB for being able to build oak-core. nor does it make sense to me to
require a coverage that can only be reached with the derby-rdb profile
enabled.
Stepping back: what's the goal of enabling the checks then? My
understanding was that we don't want to see regressions in coverage
going forward. That's a good goal, but wouldn't work for people
developing code that is only executed when running Mongo or RDB.
but now that you mention: this is for me another hint that the document
store implementations should be moved out of oak-core rather sooner thank
later. i recently looked at it and it seems doable with moderate effort. i
recently had a discussion with marcel and he proposed that those really
familiar with the document store code take care of that.
...
That's an orthogonal discussion, and yes we should have it.
Best regards, Julian
