On 26/06/2017 09:00, Michael Dürig wrote: > > I agree we should have a better look at access patterns, not only for > indexing. I recently came across a repository with about 65% of its > content in the version store. That content is pretty much archived and > never accessed. Yet it fragments the index and thus impacts general > access times.
I may say something stupid as usual, but here I can see for example that such content could be "moved to a slower repository". So for example speaking of segment, it could be stored in a compressed segment (rather than plain tar) and the repository could either automatically configure the indexes to skip such part or/and additionally create an ad-hoc index which could async by definition every, let's say, 10 seconds. We would gain on the repository size and indexing speed. Just a couple of ideas off the top of my head. Davide
