+1 for backport. In fact, given that this gives rise to very unexpected issues, I'd argue that it should even go into 1.0 (afair, IndexCopier is on 1.0. though). But, sure, since this is big and backport to 1.0 might be tricky - maybe we can decouple backport-to-1.2-1.4 and backport-to-1.0.
Thanks, Vikas On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Chetan Mehrotra <[email protected]> wrote: > At time index corruption is being seen which can be attributed to > issue fixed in OAK-5238. To address them I need to backport this to > 1.4 and 1.2 branch. > > This change is slightly bigger so need to be done carefully > > Chetan Mehrotra
