Hi Francesco and Tommaso, I was not aware of the previous discussions and will now read those threads and issues. I submitted the issue, patch and thread in good faith, not having a detailed knowledge of everything that has been discussed on oak-dev. I was not trying to ignore or circumvent any previous decisions or opinions. If OAK-6575 brings nothing new and does not address those concerns I would not be offended to have the patch and issue rejected and deleted and for Oak not to have this capability, although obviously I feel that Oak is weaker without the ability to offload bulk data streaming to infrastructure designed for that purpose.
Let me read the links you have shared and get back to you. Best Regards Ian On 4 September 2017 at 14:20, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote: > I share Francesco's concerns, the same way I shared them when we first > discussed this way back; I tried to express my doubts on the current > proposal in the email thread for OAK-6575 (linked also in Francesco's > email), which got ignored; that's fine as long as the majority of us is > happy with the current solution, probably it's just me having this not so > good feeling here with me, that some of us want this feature to be in a way > or another. > > Tommaso > > > > Il giorno lun 4 set 2017 alle ore 14:45 Francesco Mari < > [email protected]> ha scritto: > > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Chetan Mehrotra > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Adaptable pattern in itself was not much discussed at that time. > > > > Concerns about the adaptable pattern and its implications in data > > encapsulation were expressed in the old thread at [1], [2], [3], [4], > > and in other messages in the same thread. In the new thread, it was > > pointed out [5] that solving the problem discussed in OAK-6575 is > > orthogonal to the introduction of the adaptable pattern. Moreover, in > > the new thread some concerns were expressed about the adaptable > > pattern as well at [6] and [7]. > > > > [1]: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8b0021987b824b096ea9b470a4edd5 > edf1a246ef10548a2343ad4668@1462438837@%3Coak-dev.jackrabbit.apache.org%3E > > [2]: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4c352d247da81ca6ab05abfb7c5336 > 8fb88ed3c587fb09b42b87b6ae@1462439965@%3Coak-dev.jackrabbit.apache.org%3E > > [3]: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fbf28d5e864adbebd677a425cc915f > 89cbd7e0ef85a589fb4f948b51@1462784316@%3Coak-dev.jackrabbit.apache.org%3E > > [4]: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77b05609b7e6f0deedbd3282f734f8 > c606e6a7451db0698f29082d7b@1462891501@%3Coak-dev.jackrabbit.apache.org%3E > > [5]: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d8da865c1f971ff4c84c9616d9f09e > a9369f3e0c6db20f98fbc6e4d3@%3Coak-dev.jackrabbit.apache.org%3E > > [6]: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ab1d40572467eeee4ef5855af0a0a9 > e87255d1144fe40762ff8e9d47@%3Coak-dev.jackrabbit.apache.org%3E > > [7]: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/acc9eeef966916791c6073e76d3baa > 232f48abece4ae6b31f264a8ba@%3Coak-dev.jackrabbit.apache.org%3E > > >
