> The fix is fairly simple and I'd like to backport it to 1.4 and 1.6 > branch (where OAK-3768 went).
Would the backport be of use now? As any upgrade I think would happen first to initial release from that branch where this fix would not be present Chetan Mehrotra On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Vikas Saurabh <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Recently we discovered OAK-6656 which shows that if there's an > "ordered" property index on a setup then post 1.4 and with > failOnMissingProvider the commits would fail. > > While this shows up easily for non-async ordered index. The effect > with async ordered property index is that async indexing would keep on > failing in the background. > > The fix is fairly simple and I'd like to backport it to 1.4 and 1.6 > branch (where OAK-3768 went). > > Thanks, > Vikas
