+1 for backport. I've added a comment to the issue that we should probably also make background update a little more resilient.
Thanks, Vikas On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Marcel Reutegger <mreut...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to backport OAK-6685 to the maintenance branches. The fix is simple > and I consider the risk as very low. > > Regards > Marcel