+1 for backport.

I've added a comment to the issue that we should probably also make
background update a little more resilient.

Thanks,
Vikas

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Marcel Reutegger
<mreut...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to backport OAK-6685 to the maintenance branches. The fix is simple
> and I consider the risk as very low.
>
> Regards
>  Marcel

Reply via email to