Interesting. Are there use cases where users should prefer Jackrabbit over Oak? Or is Oak considered a full replacement for Jackrabbit in every case?
-MR On February 27, 2018 at 8:53:53 AM, Robert Munteanu ([email protected]) wrote: Hi, Recent questions to the jackrabbit user's list lead me to believe that users are still picking Jackrabbit 2.x as a first implementation choice. I believe that we should be pointing them to Oak instead, as that's (IMO) the better documented, supported and implemented version of a JCR repository. I haven't sketched out what needs to be changed in the docs, as I'd like to get your thoughts on this first. Thanks, Robert
