+1 from me. Every two months seems a bit more practical for where we are now.
Thanks Davide! -MR On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 8:59 AM Davide Giannella <[email protected]> wrote: > Good afternoon team, > > as we discussed in separate threads about strategies and version numbers > and we agreed in principles on the way forward we still have to address > one topic of the release: the frequency. > > Was looking at what JDK does and merge it with our own experience. > > JDK releases a new one every 6 months and on top there will be a quarter > release called "update release". We could see them as bugfix for us. > > I personally think that such frequency is way too long and while gives > time to everyone to update to a new version is kind-of shifting us away > from the model of no-branch. > > Probably by looking at the past I'm a bit thorn between a monthly or > every two months release. I'm slightly more in favour of the latter (2 > months). I think it will be the right time for adoption and burden for > us in terms of release cutting. > > Additionally we were never strict on timing and we always accommodated > shifts in both direction (early as well as late) to make room for what's > needed. > > Any thoughts on the above? > > Davide >
